A Shift in the Landscape
Well, all quiet on allĀ fronts, really… Once again, as has been the case since the early signing period was instituted a few cycles ago, Notre Dame’s recruiting class was all but wrapped up in December. In fact everyone’s recruiting class was more or less wrapped up in December; of the 173 prospects with known Notre Dame offers, only 14 remained uncommitted when the early signing period ended. Coming into this morning, only four the top 100 prospects in the 247 Composite remained uncommitted. I don’t have historical data handy, but you can rest assured that there used to be many, many more kids who announced in February.
The early signing period was designed to take pressure off kids who wanted to be done with the mayhem of recruiting. Stories abound of kids having to use multiple burner phones, getting texts and calls all hours of the day and night, facing high-pressure tactics from multiple coaches. In all sincerity, shielding kids from that is a noble goal and one I think is worth supporting in some way. What we’ve seen happen in reality though is that the pressure has just moved up in a kid’s timeline. Spring used to be a time for kids to get into the recruiting grind, get out on the road and see a few places, and start to feel their way through what might be important for them. Now, spring is what fall used to be – many prospects use their official visits in the spring and not only have a decision made by the summer, but feel substantial pressure to have a decision made by the summer.
We also saw a massive unintended consequence this past season. The decision to fire a head coach is often difficult to distill to a single reason, particularly the timing of that decision. It wouldĀ then be an oversimplification to say that the early signing period caused a rash of early terminations, but it was absolutely a factor. Clay Helton was fired two games into the season. Ed Oregon was informed that he wouldn’t be back halfway through the season. Gary Patterson walked after his administration reportedly had a similar conversation with him on Halloween weekend. A couple of weeks later, Jimmy Lake and Justin Fuente got their walking papers. Dan Mullen was unceremoniously dumped a week later. We hadn’t made it to Thanksgiving yet and the USC, Florida, LSU, Washington, and Virginia Tech jobs were all open.
Why does the timing of all those moves have anything to do with the early signing period? Simple – because athletics departments don’t want to be stuck in the situation Notre Dame, Oklahoma, and others were in. With just days to go until the early signing period, the Irish and the Sooners had to replace head coaches lured by those LSU and USC openings. A misstep by either could have been catastrophic for the 2022 class. Both programs made the right kind of headlines, Notre Dame by promoting belovedĀ wunderkind Marcus Freeman and Oklahoma by stealing favorite-son-in-hindsight Brent Venables away from Clemson. Had either school flubbed it, or had their search dragged beyond the early signing period, there was a real probability their 2022 class would fall apart. That’s the fear that drove USC, Florida, LSU, Washington, and Virginia Tech to pull the ripcord midseason.
A few key corners of the college football world have started to discuss the possibility of doing away with or changing the early signing period. This isn’t just about coaches or schools either – the massive upheaval we saw on the coaching carousel this season isn’t good for current college players or recruits. The early signing period that was designed to make recruits’ lives easier may have ultimately made everyone’s life harder, and may be on its way out. It’ll be a very interesting thing to track.
Irish Eyes Are (Mostly) Smiling
And now we turn to more specifically Notre Dame topics… Marcus Freeman made his presence felt as a recruiter immediately when he was hired. He’s the reason the Irish even looked at Jaylen Sneed, let alone landed him – especially notable since Sneed is the first defensive 247 Composite five-star the Irish have landed since signing Jaylon Smith and Max Redfield in the 2013 class. While it didn’t ultimately work out, he’s the reason Notre Dame was even in the discussion as a potential destination for borderline top 100 corner Khamauri Rogers out of Mississippi and as a potential flip for four-star Ohio State corner Jyaire Brown. He’s the reason the Irish signed unquestionably the best linebacker class in the country (#33 overall Sneed, #108 Josh Burnham, #156 Niuafe Tuihalamaka, and #309 Nolan Ziegler, all Butkus Award semifinalists). He’s the reason Tyson Ford reneged on his silent commitment to Oklahoma.
More indirectly, Tommy Rees has talked about how Freeman’s energy as a recruiter makes you want to match him competitively. We definitely saw that in several areas of the Irish staff this cycle and should see it more in the 2023 cycle with a full Freeman-approved staff pulling the strings. For all the talk of how much better the defense recruited in ’22, the offense was actually marginally better in terms of recruit quality. Each side of the ball signed 10 recruits; the average 247 Composite rating for the offense was 0.9247, while for the defense it was 0.9231. Of course there’s a quantity discussion to be had too; the average Composite score is higher with, say, Amorion Walker not in the class, but it’s hard to say it’s a better group without him. Ditto Devin Moore and the defense.
Regardless, this was a very good class – the second highest Composite average post-Weis, just barely behind that 2013 class – and the future looks very bright indeed with Freeman running the show. I think Al Washington and Chansi Stuckey will prove to be substantial upgrades as recruiters, and Deland McCullough will be at least an even trade with his predecessor. Both rumored finalists for the defensive coordinator position – Bengals LB coach Al Golden and Minnesota DC Joe Rossi – have reputations as plus recruiters. Whoever the tight end coach ends up being will be a plus recruiter. (UPDATE: Multiple reports from various reputable sources indicate that West Virginia TE/co-OC Gerad Parker is the guy.) And oh by the way, the 2023 class is currently ranked 2nd nationally, with five top 100 commits out of eight overall. For comparison, that’s just one short of the post-Weis era high for full class, which was set way back in 2011.
Class Rankings by Service
247 Composite: 7th (1 five-star, 16 four-stars, 4 three-stars, .9168 average rating)
247: 6th (17 four-stars, 3 three-stars, 1 two-star, 91.71 average rating)
Rivals: 6th (16 four-stars, 4 three-stars, 1 two-star, 3.71 average stars)
ESPN: ?? (17 four-stars, 3 three-stars, 81.1 average rating)
On3: 6th (1 five-star, 16 four-stars, 4 three-stars, 90.89 average rating)
ESPN, brilliantly, put their team rankings behind a paywall this year, so I have no idea what the ranking is. Bold move to put something behind a paywall that everyone else offers for free, but then they’ve put so little effort into their strategy on recruiting coverage that it’s hardly surprising. Safe to say though that the class is likely 6th to 8th there given how it ranks elsewhere.
On3 is a new service founded by Shannon Terry and currently gobbling up well-known team sites and writers, most notably former ESPN stalwart Ivan Maisel. The Notre Dame site took the Blue & Gold Illustrated name and staff from Rivals, if you’re wondering. I don’t know what they’ll amount to yet, but Terry is the guy who bought Rivals in 2001, built it into what it is, sold it to Yahoo in 2007, founded 247 Sports in 2010, built it into what it is, and sold it to CBS in 2015. Feels like it would be a good idea to bet on On3 finding success.
Also, note that transfer Brandon Joseph – more on him below – isĀ not included in any of these rankings. The 247 Composite has Joseph’s transfer prospect rating at 0.9300, which is roughly equivalent to a “normal” top 175 prospect.
Class Composition
Here are the number of signees by position.
QB – 1
RB – 1
WR – 1
TE – 2
OL – 5
DE – 2
DT – 1
LB – 4
DB – 3+1
P – 1
The +1 at safety is Joseph, an undergrad transfer from Northwestern. Joseph was a two year starter for the Fighting Fitzes and a consensus All-American as a redshirt freshman in 2020. He dropped off a bit last year but still is a tremendous boost for the 2022 season. Either he’ll walk into a starting role or, if he doesn’t, it will mean someone else has taken a huge step forward.
The glaring issue here is obviously the light number at receiver. Notre Dame really needed three receivers in this class; they had those three in Tobias Merriweather, CJ Williams, and Amorion Walker, but lost Williams and Walker late in the cycle and weren’t able to work out a backup plan. The Walker defection was particularly galling as the family outright lied to the Irish staff for months, but on the other hand the staff wasn’t born yesterday. The receiver class being what it is was a big part of why Del Alexander was encouraged to find employment elsewhere.
Otherwise, another edge rusher might’ve been nice, maybe a second running back, but these are pretty good numbers. I would say a game-ready safety too, but the staff addressed that with the Brandon Joseph transfer.
The Super Official 18 Stripes Class Grades
As a reminder, here’s our standard grading scale for this exercise:
95-100: Truly elite prospect with All-American potential
90-94: Multi-year starter with All-conference level potential
85-89: Eventual starter with chance to play as underclassman
80-84: Raw prospect with decent potential but a couple years away from impact
75-79: Likely a backup
70-74: Reach by the coaching staff
Staff | Offense Grade | Defense Grade | Overall Grade |
---|---|---|---|
Brendan | 90.6 | 89.8 | 90.2 |
Eric | 88.6 | 89.5 | 88.9 |
Tyler | 88.7 | 88.6 | 88.6 |
Overall | 89.3 | 89.3 | 89.2 |
I think this is the first time in all the years we’ve done this that Eric wasn’t the low man.
Offense Signees
247C | 18S Grade | Player | City/State | Ht/Wt | Position | Stars | ||||
0.9550 | 92 | Aamil Wagner | Dayton, OH | 6-6/265 | OT | * | * | * | * | * |
0.9514 | 94 | Tobias Merriweather | Camas, WA | 6-4/185 | WR | * | * | * | * | * |
0.9405 | 91 | Billy Schrauth | Fond Du Lac, WI | 6-5/300 | IOL | * | * | * | * | * |
0.9380 | 88 | Joey Tanona | Zionsville, IN | 6-5/295 | OT | * | * | * | * | * |
0.9271 | 95 | Eli Raridon | West Des Moines, IA | 6-6/228 | TE | * | * | * | * | * |
0.9210 | 90 | Jadarian Price | Denison, TX | 5-11/180 | RB | * | * | * | * | * |
0.9154 | 86 | Ty Chan | Groton, MA | 6-6/300 | OT | * | * | * | * | * |
0.8962 | 84 | Steve Angeli | Oradell, NJ | 6-3/215 | QB | * | * | * | * | * |
0.8951 | 87 | Holden Staes | Atlanta, GA | 6-4/230 | TE | * | * | * | * | * |
0.8789 | 86 | Ashton Craig | Lawrenceburg, IN | 6-5/283 | OT | * | * | * | * | * |
Defense Signees
247C | 18S Grade | Player | City/State | Ht/Wt | Position | Stars | ||||
0.9836 | 96 | Jaylen Sneed | Hilton Head Island, SC | 6-2/210 | LB | * | * | * | * | * |
0.9551 | 93 | Joshua Burnham | Traverse City, MI | 6-4/225 | LB | * | * | * | * | |
0.9520 | 94 | Tyson Ford | St. Louis, MO | 6-5/260 | DL | * | * | * | * | |
0.9377 | 86 | Niuafe Tuihalamaka | Misson Hills, CA | 6-2/235 | LB | * | * | * | * | |
0.9300 | 90 | Brandon Joseph | College Station, TX | 6-1/185 | S | * | * | * | * | |
0.9293 | 93 | Aiden Gobaira | Chantilly, VA | 6-4.5/230 | DL | * | * | * | * | |
0.9164 | 91 | Jaden Mickey | Corona, CA | 5-11.5/175 | CB | * | * | * | * | |
0.8984 | 87 | Nolan Ziegler | Grand Rapids, MI | 6-4/210 | LB | * | * | * | * | |
0.8958 | 86 | Benjamin Morrison | Phoenix, AZ | 6-0/175 | CB | * | * | * | * | |
0.8830 | 83 | Jayden Bellamy | Oradell, NJ | 5-11/175 | CB | * | * | * | ||
0.8796 | 84 | Donovan Hinish | Pittsburgh, PA | 6-2/275 | DL | * | * | * |
Specialist Signees
247C | 18S Grade | Player | City/State | Ht/Wt | Position | Stars | ||||
0.8041 | 88 | Bryce McFerson | Indian Trail, NC | 6-1/185 | P | * | * | * | * | * |
Grading Out
Addressing Needs: C+
I felt bad giving this class such a low grade, because like I said, overall it’s a very good group that does a good job addressing most needs. The receiver situation is just so, so bad though, and really puts the roster in a bind for at least the upcoming season. It’s analogous to doing well in your AP History class otherwise but missing one test – doesn’t matter how good the rest of your performance was, that zero is going to make the final grade look uglier.
You could make an argument that an edge rusher would’ve helped, and I wouldn’t disagree with you. On the other hand, the linebacker class is more than loaded and we all think there’s a decent chance Burnham could grow into an edge player. Landing elite safety Xavier Nwankpa, who chose to stay home for Iowa, would’ve pushed this class to another level, but the DB class as is has some players.
Home Run Factor: B+
The linebacker group and offensive line group are each among the best in the nation, with a credible argument for being the actual best. Sneed, as noted, is the first defensive five-star the Irish have signed in nine years. Wagner, Schrauth, Merriweather, Raridon, Burnham, Ford, Gobaira all have enormous potential. For me, what’s holding this grade back a bit is more quantity than quality. I can’t give a higher grade than this when there’s one top 100 kid in the class, even if I think several are underrated. If the 2023 class continues the way it started, this will be a different story next year. Hell, even if it just holds on.
Immediate Impact: B-
This is not a knock on this class at all – there are some really good players in it, it’s just going to be hard for most of them to steal reps from the front line guys right now. Merriweather will see time out of necessity, for sure. Price will likely be in the backfield mix, even if it’s just as a late-game finisher to take some load off the veterans. I expect Sneed and Ford to see the field a decent amount; Morrison and Mickey (if he can bulk up a little) could too. There are a lot of really good guys in this class who are going to have to wait their turn, though, which says something about the overall health of the Irish roster.
Class Comments
True, there were some near misses on elite guys – Nwankpa, Miami’s Cyrus Moss, Penn State’s Jaden Saunders and Nicholas Singleton – but it’s worth noting that it’s the highest rank class in the 247 Composite since the 2013 class ranked 3rd. That’s not to say we should be satisfied with 7th, but ranking that highly with a medium-sized class is a data point that is moving in the right direction. The 2023 class could be a huge step further in that direction, especially with the caliber of the recruiters that Freeman has added to the staff. Last year I noted six top 50 prospects in the 2021 class that I thought Notre Dame could’ve landed with better or earlier effort. They landed one of those guys this year in Sneed. They very well could end up with five or more in the 2023 cycle.
I know, we say all the time thatĀ next year is the big year. (At heart, we’re apparently all Cubs fans.) This time it feels different though, because of who is running the program and how he has already shown us he intends to run it. Of course having four top 50 level talents in it already inspires confidence too – #22 Keon Keeley, #37 Drayk Bowen, #58 Peyton Bowen, and #101 Justyn Rhett (I’ll eat a shoe if he’s not top 50 by the end of the cycle). Funny how that works.
Back to 2022, I think this is going to be a fun class to watch grow. There are some enormously talented kids here who will either break into the depth chart early or push older guys to raise their game. Or maybe both!
Prop Bets
Because there’s nothing we can’t connect to gambling, we’ll leave you with the staff’s prop bets on a few key questions about this class.
Who will see the field the soonest?
- Brendan: Tyson Ford
- Eric: Tobias Merriweather
- Tyler: Tobias Merriweather
Who has the highest upside?
- Brendan: Jaylen Sneed
- Eric: Eli Raridon
- Tyler: Aamil Wagner
Who’s your favorite offensive player?
- Brendan: Jadarian Price
- Eric: Tobias Merriweather
- Tyler: Tobias Merriweather
Who’s your favorite defensive player?
- Brendan: Aiden Gobaira
- Eric: Tyson Ford
- Tyler: Jaylen Sneed
FYI the top 10 classes ranked by ESPN are as follows:
The Bama average was 95.20. Ouch. Jimbo had more numbers but Saban got the highest rated average.
Saw Josh Pate report on Late Kick that 48% of Sabanās 5 star recruits have been drafted. Rest of CFB 5 stars, 18% got drafted. Iām guessing heās better at evaluating and developing than his competitors.
I guess I’m already in the bag for Freeman.
Always one of the best posts of the year! Great info. I do like this class, but as mentioned only 1 top-100. Already so many in 2023 on defense, it’s really exciting to see what Freeman can do as he shifts and leads the efforts on offense too. QB+WR def need the boost.
Bryce āYCNHTMKLSLSTQā McFerson
Kind of incredible how frequently this acronym can be used
I’ve got Niuafe Tuihalamaka as seeing the field first. Definitely see him on kickoff coverage lighting up some dudes. Could see him being deployed ala Liufau against UNC as well.
Who were the 6 top 100 recruits in 2011 should be this weeks trivia question? lynch, tuitt, ishaq are easy. ben counsel? was davaris class of 2011? presumably an o lineman but I really donāt know who.
Anyways, thanks for the write up. personally I think the new signing day sucks especially for the fans (not that we matter) but I miss the total mayhem of old signing day.
I was on this corner from day one. I think a lot of people are coming around that the way it is now sucks.
What was the original purpose of the signing day? When did it change from whenever regular kids have to make their decision?
Is it more than just a way to give everyone a break from the recruiting process?
The original NSD came about because some conferences had different rules from one another and it became too chaotic. The original NSD for the first Wednesday in February came into law in the early 1980’s.
BUT, this was still an era before players enrolled early. I think it was pretty common right through the 1990’s for players to wait well past February to make a decision and it wasn’t too uncommon for some players in those Holtz years to be taking official visits just a couple weeks before fall camp.
The system seems screwed now because so many players enroll early. I wonder if it’s better for everyone if they outlaw EE’s?
Is there a way to create two sets of rules for those who are enrolling early and those who are not? E.g. you can only sign at some early signing date if you are enrolling early? Otherwise, you can’t sign until early Feb.?
I personally like the idea of an early signing day in August or even late July before the season, which theoretically would at least help with the whole ‘we’ve gotta fire our coach in September to save the recruiting class’ thing, but I’m sure that would be rife with unintended consequences as well.
Well, for one, how about when the coach is fired at the end of the year? Wouldn’t a lot of kids want to reconsider their commitment – esp. since they had less time to consider where to commit?
Don’t think it would be too difficult to build an exception for kids to be released from their letter of intent if the coach is fired. If players are allowed to freely transfer one time right now, I can’t imagine too many schools would fight a rule allowing a released from a commitment if the head coach is fired. (I would also push for allowing a release from a commitment if the commit’s coordinator or position coach moves on).
If you added all those exceptions it would seem to barely count as a commitment or a signing since positions coaches move on all the time!
I mean they can transfer right away. There isn’t any real commitment by any coach or any player in CFB at any time.
that’s true.
But you can only do that once. At some point players are more or less going to be stuck. And I think it will slow the transfer rate a bit.
That might work.
I like this as a starting point idea, and it also looks to be the way the world is moving with the continuous shift in recent years that pretty much anyone eligible to EE usually does in the high-end world of NCAA. It seems like for ND at least in the past few years that almost all exceptions to not EE’ing are for the situations where the kids aren’t eligible or allowed to leave HS early.
I would think legally, they’re not going to be able to stop kids from enrolling early. Some kids are now reclassifying to a whole year early.
For the record:
That class was good but very top heavy. It had 22 non-specialist signees; seven of them were ranked lower than this class’s lowest non-specialist, Ashton Craig, who is #512. Among those seven were Nick Martin, Matthias Farley, and Josh Atkinson, but still.
Similar story in the 2012 class, which was headlined by Gunner Kiel, Davonte Neal, and Elijah Shumate but had seven of the other 12 non-specialists outside the top 350.
The 2013 class was pretty similar to this one – two five-stars, 17 four-stars, and four three-stars.
Also, you were sort of right on all three guesses? Daniels, an OL, and a Ben. Not bad.
haha touchƩ. Man 10 years feels like a lifetime. I legitimately could not tell you if hegarty played at all. cannot believe koyack was 42 overall, that puts him pretty much at mayer/rudolph rankings. I remember ben counsel and thinking he was a brian kelly diamond in the rough and would be a star. Oh well. thanks for the research and trip down memory lane
Brendan, what are your thoughts on which is better of the following two classes that have nearly the same average — (a) a top heavy class with two or three 5 stars, but fewer 4 stars, or (b) a more even class with a whole bunch of 4 stars but no 5 stars?
I think generalized statements are a little hard because the quality of each class is so heavily dependent on the context. For example, with that top heavy 2011 class, if you take out either of the two five-stars, Lynch or Ishaq, and replace them with #118 overall WR Rashad Greene (had an ND offer, 2 1000-yd seasons and 29 career TDs at FSU) that clearly would be a good swap that would likely have helped ND win more games. If, on the other hand, you swap out the almost-five-star, Tuitt, for #116 overall WDE Jason Gibson (had an ND offer, appeared in two games at Cal), that’s a massive step down.
Now, that said… If the choice is between a class like 2022 and a class like 2011, without knowing anything else, I would take the 2022 class every time. Five-stars are great, but when you take that many projects in the bottom of the class you’re asking for holes in the roster. Weis was really good at landing headliners and not much else, and we saw how that turned out. It’s not so much not wanting the top guys as insulating yourself better against a critical failure somewhere.
Now, that said, the clear solution is to land a few five stars and a bunch of four stars. I love diamonds in the rough as much as the next guy, and Julian Love makes for an awesome story, but there’s absolutely no question that the star quotient in a class correlates to the hit rate in that class. Pile up the talent and see what happens. I think that’s what Freeman is going to do, and I think we should be prepared to see more roster churn because of it. Healthy churn that happens at all elite programs.
Great article — a few thoughts:
(1) Wow, Eric was not the lowest rater
(2) I agree with Brendan that Price and Gobaira are going to be really good
(3) It’s a really good class, but it still amazing that even with a class like this, ND is still not catching up to the top recruiting schools (e.g., in terms of number of 5 stars, top 100’s, etc.)
Question — is Burnham the player that will actually make sense in the hybrid rusher / middle LB role that Foskey played this year?
Some people think that about Burnham. I want to see his athleticism against ND players first, I have my doubts.
Does anyone know why Jimbo attacked an unnamed ND VP yesterday? I get the context that he doesn’t want people to talk about TAMU’s NIL activities, but I haven’t heard anything out of ND about it.
https://sports.yahoo.com/texas-a-ms-jimbo-fisher-calls-out-clown-acts-over-message-board-nil-rumors-231442683.html
I mean, it’s completely legal. Who cares? Why is it insulting to suggest someone went to aTm for money? If anything he should play up all the money they can get.
The unnamed ND VP is Lou Nanni, who tweeted something about what Texas A&M doing being the destruction of college football as we know it (paraphrasing).
With Nanni’s complaint, as with all others of its ilk, I think it’s cure/funny/entertaining etc. to pretend that anything’s different than it ever was. Not going to name names, but we’ve gotten very solid info that some recent ND recruits never gave ND a second look because there was a price tag just to get them to visit. Pretty much every top player in the SEC since forever, particularly at the big boy programs, got paid by somebody.
Like Jimbo said a while back, this all is no different than what’s been going on forever, NIL just made it legal. I agree it could change football, but so what – this is the free market at work. I’m in the camp of it all finding equilibrium eventually anyway.
CFB as we knew it was very very broken. Good thing to destroy it.